Hyosung GT 650 R (2005–2018): A V-Twin Underdog with Surprising Charms
Introduction
The Hyosung GT 650 R is a motorcycle that defies expectations. Produced from 2005 to 2018, this Korean-built sportbike carved out a niche as an affordable alternative to Japanese middleweights like the Suzuki SV650 and Kawasaki Ninja 650. While it never quite shook off its reputation as a "budget" option, the GT 650 R offers a unique blend of V-twin character, sport-touring versatility, and enough performance to keep riders grinning. After spending a week with a well-maintained 2014 model, here’s why this underdog deserves a second look.
Engine and Performance: Thump Meets Hustle
At the heart of the GT 650 R lies a 647cc, liquid-cooled, 90-degree V-twin engine. Early models (2005–2008) used carburetors, but from 2009 onward, fuel injection smoothed out throttle response. Output hovers around 76–79 HP (56–58 kW) and 66–68 Nm (49–50 lb-ft) of torque, with peak power arriving at 9,000 RPM.
Riding Impressions:
- Mid-Range Muscle: The engine’s sweet spot lives between 3,000–7,500 RPM. Crack the throttle in third gear, and the bike surges forward with a throaty exhaust note that’s more "growl" than "scream." It’s no supersport, but the torque-rich delivery makes overtaking or carving canyon roads effortless.
- High-RPM Limitations: Spin it past 8,000 RPM, and vibrations creep into the bars and pegs. The engine feels strained here, urging you to short-shift—a reminder that this V-twin prefers relaxed cruising over redline heroics.
- Fuel Injection vs. Carburetion: Later FI models (post-2009) eliminate the low-RPM hesitation noted in early carbureted versions. Cold starts are drama-free, and throttle transitions feel sharper.
Metric/Imperial Conversions:
- 647cc = 39.48 cubic inches
- 79 HP = 59 kW | 68 Nm = 50.2 lb-ft
Handling and Ride Experience: Confidence in the Corners
Hyosung equipped the GT 650 R with a steel twin-spar frame, 41mm inverted forks, and a preload-adjustable rear monoshock. At 208–215 kg (458–474 lbs) wet, it’s no featherweight, but the chassis hides its heft well.
On the Road:
- Flickable Geometry: With a 25-degree rake and 1435mm wheelbase (56.5 inches), the GT 650 R changes direction eagerly. It’s no track weapon, but it carves twisties with a neutral, planted feel.
- Suspension Tuning: The USD forks absorb bumps competently, though adjusting the damping (on later models) yields minimal change. The rear shock handles two-up riding better than expected—no small feat for a budget bike.
- Braking: Dual 300mm front discs with 4-piston calipers (post-2010) offer adequate stopping power. Initial bite is soft compared to rivals, but modulation improves with aftermarket pads.
Ergonomics:
- Seat Height: Ranges from 780mm (30.7") to 831mm (32.7")—accessible for shorter riders.
- Riding Position: Semi-aggressive clip-ons and rearset pegs strike a balance between sporty and touring-friendly. After an hour in the saddle, my wrists and knees still felt fresh.
Design and Features: Function Over Flair
The GT 650 R’s styling echoes early-2000s Japanese sportbikes, with a full fairing, dual headlights, and a stepped seat. Build quality improved over its 13-year run, but fit-and-finish quirks persist:
- Highs: LED taillights (2013+), adjustable levers, and a 17L fuel tank (4.5 gallons) for 250+ km (155+ mi) range.
- Lows: Cheap switchgear, uneven panel gaps, and a dated analog-digital dash.
Passenger-Friendly?
Surprisingly, yes. The pillion seat is wide and cushioned, and grab rails (added in 2011) inspire confidence. My passenger praised comfort during a 2-hour ride—something rarely said about sportbikes.
Competition: How Does It Stack Up?
The GT 650 R faced fierce rivals in the 650cc segment. Here’s how it compares:
1. Suzuki SV650
- Pros: Legendary smoothness, aluminum frame, cult following.
- Cons: Pricier, less torque below 5,000 RPM.
- Verdict: The SV650 is the GT’s spiritual sibling but with polish the Hyosung lacks.
2. Kawasaki Ninja 650
- Pros: Parallel-twin revs freely, sharper styling, superior brakes.
- Cons: Less characterful engine, higher seat height.
- Verdict: The Ninja feels more modern but lacks the GT’s V-twin charm.
3. Honda CBR650F
- Pros: Inline-4 refinement, bulletproof reliability.
- Cons: Heavier, higher cost of ownership.
- Verdict: The Honda is a better all-rounder but doesn’t excite like the GT.
Hyosung’s Edge:
- Price: New, it undercut rivals by ~15%. Today, used models sell for 30–50% less than comparable SV650s.
- Customization: The simple chassis and ubiquitous V-twin make it a blank canvas for mods.
Maintenance: Keeping the GT 650 R Thriving
Ownership costs are where the GT 650 R shines. Here’s what to prioritize:
Key Service Intervals:
- Oil Changes: Every 5,000 km (3,100 mi) with 3.2L of 10W-40 (API SG+). Consider synthetic blends for smoother shifts.
- Valve Adjustments: Every 12,000 km (7,500 mi). Intake: 0.1–0.2mm, Exhaust: 0.2–0.3mm (cold).
- Coolant: Replace every 2 years using 1.6L of ethylene glycol mix.
- Spark Plugs: NGK CR8E or iridium CR8EIX every 16,000 km (10,000 mi).
Common Upgrades:
- Brake Pads: Swap stock pads for EBC HH sintered compounds.
- Suspension: Hyperpro springs and oil improve front-end feedback.
- Exhaust: A slip-on (e.g., Delkevic) unlocks the V-twin’s rumble without breaking the bank.
Pro Tip: Check the clutch cable free play frequently—stiff engagement is a common griate.
Conclusion: The Underdog’s Appeal
The Hyosung GT 650 R isn’t perfect. It’s rough around the edges, outgunned by Japanese rivals, and lacks the prestige of European brands. Yet, there’s something endearing about its honest, unpretentious nature. For riders seeking a budget-friendly V-twin that can commute, tour, and play on backroads—all while turning heads with its muscular stance—the GT 650 R delivers. It’s a reminder that sometimes, imperfection has its own kind of charm.
Whether you’re refreshing an older model or personalizing a newer one, MOTOPARTS.store has the components to keep your GT 650 R running strong—from OEM-spec NGK plugs to performance brake upgrades.
Specifications sheet
Engine | |
---|---|
Stroke: | Four-stroke |
Max power: | 80 kW | 107.0 hp |
Max torque: | 68 Nm |
Fuel system: | Fuel Injection (with immobilizer) |
Lubrication: | Wet sump |
Max power @: | 9250 rpm |
Displacement: | 647 ccm |
Max torque @: | 7500 rpm |
Bore x stroke: | 81.5 x 62 mm (3.2 x 2.4 in) |
Configuration: | V |
Cooling system: | Liquid |
Compression ratio: | 11.5:1 |
Number of cylinders: | 2 |
Valves per cylinder: | 4 |
Dimensions | |
---|---|
Wheelbase: | 1435 mm (56.5 in) |
Dry weight: | 195 |
Wet weight: | 220 |
Seat height: | 830 mm (32.7 in) |
Overall width: | 700 mm (27.5 in) |
Overall height: | 1132 mm (44.6 in) |
Overall length: | 2095 mm (82.4 in) |
Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 in) |
Fuel tank capacity: | 17 L (4.5 US gal) |
Drivetrain | |
---|---|
Chain type: | 525 |
Final drive: | chain |
Chain length: | 118 |
Transmission: | 6-speed |
Rear sprocket: | 47 |
Front sprocket: | 15 |
Maintenance | |
---|---|
Rear tire: | 160/60-z-17 |
Engine oil: | 10W40 |
Front tire: | 120/60-z-17 |
Idle speed: | 1400 ± 100 RPM |
Brake fluid: | DOT 4 |
Spark plugs: | NGK CR8E or NGK CR8EIX |
Spark plug gap: | 0.7 |
Coolant capacity: | 1.6 |
Forks oil capacity: | 0.76 |
Engine oil capacity: | 3.2 |
Engine oil change interval: | Every 5000 km or 2 years |
Valve clearance (intake, cold): | 0.10–0.20 mm |
Valve clearance check interval: | 24,000 km / 15,000 mi |
Valve clearance (exhaust, cold): | 0.20–0.30 mm |
Recommended tire pressure (rear): | 2.5 bar (36 psi) solo, 2.8 bar (41 psi) with passenger |
Recommended tire pressure (front): | 2.25 bar (33 psi) |
Chassis and Suspension | |
---|---|
Frame: | Steel double pipe |
Rear brakes: | Single 230 mm disc, 2-piston caliper |
Front brakes: | 2 x 300 mm discs, 4-piston calipers |
Rear suspension: | Swing arm with progressive linkage monoshock (preload adjustable) |
Front suspension: | 41mm USD telescopic forks (compression and rebound damping adjustable) |
Rear wheel travel: | 100 mm (3.9 in) |
Front wheel travel: | 120 mm (4.7 in) |